(Continued from Ancient Viet 3: Following the Genetic Trail)
I always knew my family’s spoken language was slightly different than what was spoken on the streets. There were many terminology which didn’t fit in with the Việt vocabulary that I learned in school and on the playground. For example, my father called his mother, my paternal grandmother, by the word Bu (母) pronounced as in the English word ‘boo’. I never understood why. I just thought he was a bit strange.
As I got older, I found out that the Taiwanese word for mother is pronounced Bu, and the Japanese word for mother is Bô (pronounced ’bow’). I thought that rather odd since there really isn’t a connection between my Father and a native Taiwanese (or Japanese). So I decided to dig around myself to find out what’s the deal here.
Before I go too far, let me just lay out the four basic language groups: Indo-European, Afro-Asiatic, Sino-Tibetan, and Austronesian. I am zeroing in on Austronesian because this is the language root of the Việt people.
Austronesia is further split into four separate groups. Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Tai-Kadai, and Tibito-Burman (more commonly known as Sino-Tibetan). My question was, where does Vietnamese fit into these four branches? Since I am not a linguist, I had to go find out what the linguists of note thought.
Back in 1852, James Logan thought it was Austroasiatic (he called it Môn Anam back then). In 1905, another linguist named W. Schmidt thought it was Môn Khmer, but then changed his mind and said it had to be part of the the Tai-Kadai grouping. Then in 1912, Maspéro placed it in with the Tai-Kadai. But then, in 1952, Andre Haudricourt placed the Vietnamese language back into the Austro-Asiatic group again.
So which is it? Austroasiatic or Tai-Kadai, and why the mix-up over such a long time (roughly 100 years)? The answer came in 1975 when a linguist by the name of Paul Benedict decided that the old groupings didn’t work, so he proposed to combine the Tai-Kadai and Austronesian into one grouping called Proto-Austro-Tai (or PAT for short). This is because Vietnamese didn’t fit in either one, having features found in both. But that still left the other two groupings Austronesian and Sino-Tibetan.
Upon further review, the various linguists of the day found a single language that combined all four groupings, making it the proto-language of the South-East-Asian and South-Asian world. They proposed a new name, Austric, to combine all four into one so that the single language would have a placement. This single language came out of the Hòa Bình culture, which eventually evolved into the Việt culture and encompasses the written Văn Khoa Đẩu (more commonly known as the tadpole script), aka Proto-Việt language.
This tadpole script was found everywhere, all over southeast Asia, in Japan, Taiwan, southern China, even into Thailand and Sumatra. It was carved on rocks, bones, turtle shells, megalithic stones, you name it. Once people figured out what it was, it turned up everywhere. Reading this script is not extremely difficult either…if you know Vietnamese. Of course, the words are a bit strange, but a decent grasp of old Việt language is really all that one needs to be able to read the ancient phonetic writing on these rocks.
Incidentally… Hòa Bình means Peaceful. I kinda like that.
(Continue to Ancient Viet 5: Văn Khoa Đẩu)
I think you’ve become a bit confused with the concept of the Asian language families. First of all, the Austronesian language family is not the origin of the Viet people. Second of all, Mon-Khmer is a sub-branch of the Austronesian, the other being the Munda branch.
The classification of the Vietnamese language is still a huge linguistic debate today. Some say it’s an Austroasiatic language>Mon-Khmer>Viet-Muong. Some say it’s a Tai-Kadai language. We all, however, accept that it is a language which was heavily influenced by the Sino-Tibetan languages. Vietnam’s contact with the Sino-Tibetan languages and possibly Tai-Kadai has made it difficult to classify it wholly into a specific grouping. The phonology has changed so much it does not seem close to most of the Austroasiatic languages. So what I’m trying to say is that it’s an open debate with a strong argument at the Mon-Khmer camp. The Sino-Tibetan camp has some pretty good and solid evidence but the Austro-Asiatic grouping is generally the more accepted. The Tai-Kadai grouping seems to have a more fairytale based argument. Being that the Au Viet/Ou Yue people moved southwards to today’s Vietnam. These people were probably the Tai-Kadai people of Southern China. But then again, genetic evidence is not useful as 1000 years of Chinese rule of the region today known as Vietnam has somewhat diluted the Vietnamese.
Hello Taoist babe. I am immensely enjoying reading your writings and your thoughts about the Viet people. Your ideas always piques my interests for the Viet cultures and their struggles to survive as it passing down to this generation and beyond. Thank you for just doing this. You make me forever proud to be a Vietnamese. Ever heard of the Voynich manuscript ?. There were speculations saying that it was written in a language similar to our ancient tadpole scripts. Hope you will dig it and write something about it. I would love to see what is your ideas about it.
Thanks, that’s some interesting links. I want to learn Vietnamese. I only know a handful of phrases.